top of page

IGNITE

BY THE EMBER COLLECTIVE

Behavioral Health HR Isn’t Broken — It’s Underpowered, Underpaid, and Undervalued

In consultation with our founder’s perspective, this article unpacks why HR in behavioral health is structurally set up to fail — and what operational leaders can do about it.


Across the behavioral health landscape, HR leaders are expected to deliver director-level outcomes — stabilizing workforce turnover, accelerating time-to-hire, ensuring compliance, strengthening culture, and mitigating legal risk.


Yet in many facilities they are:

  • Compensated at generalist market rates

  • Burdened with transactional work

  • Excluded from strategic leadership tables

  • Rarely given the tools or support to lead


This mismatch isn’t a talent issue — it’s a design issue. You can’t ask someone to move mountains when all you’ve given them is a shovel.


Numbers Say What Leaders Won’t

When we look at compensation benchmarks, the discrepancy becomes stark:

  • The national average salary for a Human Resources Director in the United States is about $173,000 per year — a benchmark for what strategic HR should command. (salary.com)

  • Yet within behavioral health, many HR leadership roles land well below that:

    • Some behavioral health HR directors are paid around $79,000–$90,000 per year. (indeed.com)

    • Even average salaries at some behavioral health organizations are near $86,000. (indeed.com)

    • At certain facilities, compensation for HR directors can be below the regional cost of living — and far below comparable roles in broader healthcare. (indeed.com)


Meanwhile, Directors of Behavioral Health (the operational leaders) — roles with far broader scope and strategic accountability — typically earn well into the six-figures, often $115,000+ annually. (ziprecruiter.com)


This isn’t a rounding error — it’s an operational signal: Behavioral health continues to underinvest in the very function expected to manage its most complex asset: people.


Why This Happens — And Why It Matters

1. Leaders Don’t Value What They’ve Never Experienced

Most operational leaders entered their roles through clinical or operational pathways, not HR. They’ve never worked with HR leaders who:

  • Understand workforce analytics

  • Tie people metrics to financial results

  • Advocate for culture as a strategic asset


So when the conversation turns to increasing HR investment, it’s abstract — until someone demonstrates it.


2. The Role Is Defined as “Admin” — Not Strategy

Too often, HR in behavioral health is shorthand for:

  • Onboarding paperwork

  • Leave of absence processing

  • Terminations

  • Benefit administration

  • Discipline documentation


That’s not strategic HR — that’s transactional support. Then leaders wonder why turnover stays high and risk remains unmanaged.


3. Compensation Doesn’t Reflect the Outcome Expectations

Imagine asking a generalist-level employee — without bonus eligibility and with limited strategic scope — to:

  • Hit turnover goals

  • Speed up time-to-fill

  • Reduce compliance risk

  • Fix culture

…and then be measured on it.


That’s not leadership. That’s overextension.


This compensation mismatch not only perpetuates turnover in HR itself — it also prevents HR leaders from operating with the authority and resources required to drive business outcomes.


4. The Industry Hasn’t Taught HR How to Be Strategic

Because HR in behavioral health has been structured this way for so long, another hard truth has emerged: many HR leaders in the industry do not see themselves as strategic partners — and even when they want to, they are often not taught what that actually means.

Too many HR professionals in behavioral health have been trained to manage tasks, not outcomes. They are excellent at processing paperwork, managing employee relations, and keeping files in order, but have never been expected to understand the financial and operational drivers of the business.


It is not uncommon to encounter HR leaders who are responsible for turnover goals, staffing stability, and risk mitigation — yet have never been taught how to read an income statement, explain EBITDA, or understand EPOB and how human capital directly impacts it.

This is not a personal failure. It is a systemic one.


Strategic HR requires fluency in operational metrics. HR leaders should know their census, understand how overtime percentages affect EPOB, and be able to explain why staffing may look “fine” on paper while the organization is actually critically understaffed due to excessive overtime or employees on leave. An EPOB number can appear stable while masking serious workforce risk — and HR should be equipped to explain that to leadership clearly and confidently.


That level of understanding does not happen by accident. It requires senior HR leaders in behavioral health to do more than manage — it requires them to teach.

Monthly workforce metrics, regular reporting expectations, and consistent exposure to operational data should be standard, not optional. HR teams should be expected to understand how staffing, overtime, leave of absence trends, turnover, and recruitment timelines all intertwine — and how those variables directly affect financial performance and patient care.


The reality is this: if HR is never taught to think strategically, it cannot show up strategically. And when HR cannot articulate its impact in operational terms, it reinforces the very perception that keeps it excluded from leadership conversations.


Try Before You Buy: Fractional HR as the Bridge

Here’s where behavioral health organizations can flip the script.

Instead of:

  • Hiring a full-time HR director at underfunded rates

  • Leaving strategic outcomes to chance

  • Expecting unclear ROI


Consider fractional HR leadership — a model where you bring in a seasoned, strategic HR partner on a contractual basis to:

  • Evaluate your current HR function

  • Identify strength areas and gaps

  • Build measurable workforce strategies

  • Align policy, culture, and benefits with organizational goals

  • Demonstrate ROI before making a full-time commitment


What this does is simple but profound: It lets operational leaders see strategic HR in action before they fully commit to it. And once you’ve experienced what a high-impact HR leader can do, investing becomes not just logical — it becomes necessary.


The Wake-Up Call for Behavioral Health

This isn’t about defending HR.


It’s about:

  • Recognizing that the industry’s HR model is structurally underpowered

  • Acknowledging that expecting executive outcomes from underpaid generalists is unrealistic

  • Understanding that strategic HR is an investment, not a cost center


Facilities that embrace strategic HR — not as an admin support function, but as a

leadership competency tied to human capital outcomes — will outperform those that don’t.


Where Ember Collective Comes In

At The Ember Collective, we help behavioral health organizations:

  • Assess current HR functions through an operational lens

  • Build such functions into strategic engines that support recruitment, retention, compliance, and culture

  • Use fractional HR as a bridge to full-time strategic leadership


We don’t just support HR — we help it earn its place at the executive table.


Ignite Culture. Fuel Results.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page